Description
This course has been an ongoing experiment. Students have often asked why our department does not offer a basic course on
the religions of
the world.
They have sought a kind of classic survey, to give
them a certain cultural literacy in
the world’s major religions (on “literacy,” cf. S. Pro
thero, Religious Literacy. Also look at
https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/what-we-do/our-approach/what-religious-literacy and
https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/what-we-do/our-approach/core-principles as well as
the Pew survey
http://www.pewforum.org/2010/09/28/u-s-religious-knowledge-survey/). At
the same time, several critics have raised questions about
the whole project of defining, locating, and comparing
the major religious traditions, often accusing
the authors of world religions textbooks of western biases and masked
theological agendas. Meanwhile, a revised version of Huston Smith’s 1958 book Religions of Man is continually reprinted and continually outsells far more sophisticated textbooks. When reading a world religions textbook, one should ask if
the author is trying to make a particular religion look good, or, more likely, trying to make certain versions of all religions look good.
Our goal will be to try to comprehend just what cultural literacy would mean when studying
the major religious traditions of
the world, while at
the same time developing an appreciation for some of
the blind spots and problems in this enterprise. To a large extent, we will do some serious construction before we feel ready for de-construction. Most weeks, we will cover one of five major areas (South Asia, East Asia, Judaism, Christianity, Islam) and students will read a different authors’ treatment of this material. We will have a general discussion of
the material covered in
the variety of books we are considering, to get a sense of
the different authors’ choices and to shake our confidence in
the idea that
there are simple facts that any objective observer would record. At
the end of each area, we will have a short quiz on some of
the agreed upon “facts.”
The final paper will be
the student’s critical reading of
their chosen textbook, in light of
the issues raised throughout
the semester and
the questions raised by
theorists in
the study of religion (e.g.,Masuzawa, Nongbri, Laine et al. …and take a look at Religion for Breakfast:
https://religionforbreakfast.com/ .